Monday, January 14, 2019

Sandman Slim-Chance of me picking up the next one

Hello wonderful readers-look at my optimism in pluralizing reader! Let it engulf you in joy, and pick you up, if you are feeling down.
You will need this positivity, so wrap yourself in it like a blanket now...because I am going to tear this book a part with my rage. I was so unhappy with this book early into it, that most of this post will be about how everything tacked on to infuriate me. That's right dear readers, you're getting the first ever RAGE READ!

Today's instalment of Jass Reads Books brings the challenge of  A book with a Two-Word Title!
I chose this challenge to cross off, because I had just borrowed a book from the library with a two-word title! I was also excited to read it because it was an Urban Fantasy book, said to be quite good. I am a big fan of urban fantasy, due to the genre combining a lot of stuff I find entertaining to read about: Mystery, crime, magic, the supernatural. Urban fantasy is fantasy set in an urban city/landscape, which also appeals to me, because I'm a city person and I think the updated setting has a different sort of immersion. I'm actually writing my own Urban Fantasy, it's a WIP that has been a WIP for some time now...although that is not the point! I'm over emphasizing how much I'm into this genre because... I HATED THE BOOK I READ! I was so over it, so fast, you would think it was a trend from the early 2000s.
Find your own terrible 2000 trend, I'm not putting myself through that!
So what was this book? Ugh, I don't even want to write it, lest it give the thing even a smidge of attention/marketing...but alas I have to: I present Sandman Slim by Richard Kadrey.

I really wanted to like it. I really did. It opens with our protagonist James "Jimmy" Stark popping out of a cemetery in a "Germs" T-shirt. As a huge fan of the Germs, and Darby Crash's near-legendary charisma, I was pretty happy to see where we were headed with this story.

Ugh.

Okay, I could explain what this is about in a succinct summary, but instead I'm going to explain why it sucks with it's sexism instead.

This book is the mother of all "Women in Refrigerators" without even being a comic book! 
What do I mean by this? Well dear readers, this is the part of the blog where I go out on a tangent to explain my ramblings: "Women in Refrigerators" or WiR, is a trope that was coined by comic book writer Gail Simone to refer to the overwhelming amount of female characters who were killed, maimed, or de-powered to move the MALE protagonist's story arc along. Their suffering and anguish are just a tool for the male protagonist's inciting incident or deepened resolve, and to add salt to the wound, they are often barely described or rounded out because they didn't matter as characters to the writers from the start. They weren't characters, they were 'sad events' for the main guy to have experienced. The name is a reference to a scene in Green Lantern, where Kyle Rayner goes home to find his girlfriend killed and in his fridge. Gross right?
So now I'm a little into this book, I'm starting to like it and WHAM! It hits me with a WiR so hard, I think a kidney burst. Not mine, just a kidney, somewhere, belonging to something. Maybe it was a kidney bean! Or maybe my misery helped out someone else's and it was a kidney stone that no longer exists...because it burst into nothing. I'm getting to sucked into this...lets get back on track.
Stark, as he goes by, but since this is written after Game of Thrones premiered (because lets face it, the books didn't have the same place in pop-culture until HBO came around) I just roll my eyes. Remember, I am heavily heated at this book within a couple of chapters, so F@#$ this Stark. Anyways, Stark, has escaped hell, where he has been for eleven years! He was tricked and betrayed by his friends, a circle of other magician youngsters, and sent down to the pit at nineteen years old, alive. He is not a trapped soul, he is a trapped, living, person. He escaped hell after eleven years to get revenge. This is essentially what the back cover said in its synopsis. It's good right: Betrayal, torment, suffering, the revenge is super justified. But Stark isn't back because of his imprisonment...oh no. He's back because Alice, the love of his life, has been killed. SHE'S BEEN KILLED! HE F$@$#@$ BACK BECAUSE SHE HAS BEEN KILLED! This is the most NEEDLESS DEATH I HAVE EVER READ AS MOTIVATION!!!! I get enraged just thinking about it all over again! There is already a strong reason to want to escape hell and want revenge...it's the whole being set up and trapped in hell part! See what I mean about the mother of all WiR's now? This poor character, who we only meet in flashbacks, doesn't even exist when the book starts! She was stuffed in the fridge, off screen, before we even had a book! And why? I'm seriously asking, why? Again, there are tons of reasons for Stark to come back to earth and want to kill those who sent him to hell.  After this realization, everything was downhill.

I don't want to waste my time on this book. 

In no particular order:
Every female character is described by looks and f@#$ability. Stark is still a nineteen year old in his head, so every young, skinny, thing mentioned, he imagines sleeping with. That's it. 

One such girl is the 'green-haired pixie' cashier at a dougnut place. Who... gives her novel the SECOND WIR BY GETTING SHOT MULTIPLE TIMES AND DYING BY THE SECONDARY VILLAINS, TO PROVE A POINT TO STARK, WHO IS AN UNLIKEABLE PIECE OF S@#$ ! Also dear readers, notice she has no name. This is a place he goes a few times, most cashiers have name tags, so I'm going to assume she does to, but he doesn't notice it. No it's more important to wonder if the mandatory alien antennae she has to wear, stay on when she has sex with her boyfriend. 

The only woman he doesn't like? A female angel with tons of authority and power, who is described 'looking in drag'. If this was a better book, written by a better person, with better words...I would give the benefit of the doubt to suggest this is meant to show that angels find being human foreign and strange. That they dress in human drag, to play a part. But this book is not a better book, with a better writer, so F@#$ this book and this writer.  

And also I love doughnuts! So how dare this book taint what is a wonderful thing. It is beyond reproachable! 

Next thing, unnecessary ableism. R-Word thrown out hear and there. I know it has to do with character's immaturity, but there are better ways. 

Then we have Stark being the worst person. He is cruel, but has a conscious. After my reader rage, this doesn't make him more noble or likeable. It makes everything he does extra cold because we know he's thinking he should let this go, or be better about it. Again F#$% this Stark.

The worst part of all, is this book, stripped away from the crap...IS a good story. It could have been a good story. Instead it is the above.

Apparently this book is going to be made into a movie, which I can't handle. I'm ending my post here, because giving this book more thought is not something I want to do. Thanks for sticking through this post with me readers. Hopefully the next book is better, where I tackle a book with a plant in the title or on the cover.

Jass out. Hit me with your thoughts in the comments. 

Tuesday, January 8, 2019

Returning to The World of Chrestomanci with a new POV! and a Dedication to S. Boden

Early January and I am bringing you my first read! I feel so on top of things! So "Woooh! 2019!" ...It's sort of gross. If you know me, you know I'm pretty indifferent towards the new year: I don't make resolutions, I do make a yearly Zombie Apocalypse Team. I follow the "well we arbitrarily chose this 365 day calendar, so I guess it's a new year by virtue of that until they decide to change it!" school of thought (and if that isn't a school of thought, as a teacher, I feel I can invent it on the spot).

However, my feelings on New Year are not the focus of this post...no the focus is Stacey Boden! What? You ask. How is it Stacey Boden, you ponder? Let me tell you: If you read the previous post, I mentioned a friend encouraged me to continue this blog. I expressed to her how occasionally writing this blog makes me self-conscious, which dampens my desire to write it. Long story short, she said well Stacey loves these things so you know at least she'll like it! That was enough for me! I am nothing if not a people pleaser, and one person counts! So thank you to all the Stacey Boden's out there for their love of literature and sightly self-aggrandizing blogs (Have you seen how many books I'm trying to read? I mean, c'mon!)! This one's for you!

Okay, so lets get to the book. As mentioned in the previous post, I am beginning this challenge with a book that makes you nostalgic. At first I took this to mean a book I read as a child, so I thought I'd call the first one in and re-read Harry Potter. But then I learned something dear readers that shocked me to my core. It was as if the book heavens opened up from above and said stop! Put down that copy of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone! Why? Because there are more books added to the Chrestomanci ("KREST–OH–MAN–SEE") Series by Diana Wynne Jones (RIP)! I gasped! This is fate, I said to myself. A book that makes me nostalgic, but is still new to me! How did I not know this? How has it taken me this long to learn there were 'new' (last book published in 2006) books in the Worlds of Chrestomanci? It was because they were published after I graduated highschool, and assumed that a series (at the time) that had its last book published in 1982, and its latest short story in 2000 was probably done! IT WAS NOT! So dear readers I bring you Conrad's Fate by Diana Wynne Jones!
Published in 2005
Where to start with this book? I guess some backstory is needed, but my personal thought process on this book was, "OMG! OMG! OMG! Another book! I'm so happy!" Unfortunately that isn't helpful for those who do not know this series. So backstory it is!

I read the first book in the "Worlds of Chrestomanci" series, Charmed Life (1977),  when I was in grade 8. I picked up this colourful cover at my local Chapters, and was intrigued by the back cover. The books take place in a world where...there are many worlds! Referred to as the "Twelve Related Worlds" they are a series of Earths that started off as one world but split off after possible choices in history, particularly geological history. 

Allow me to give a brief explanation:
Within each of the world's there are about 9 series, although it's hinted there could me more, and they are formed when something historically big happens in the that specific world, and two (or more) outcomes are possible. One outcome happens in the original or premier series of that world, and the other happens in a split-off but parallel second series. For example: There are 12 worlds, they are all joined by a great edge. Something big occurs in World 3 Series A. It is so monumental that the alternative outcome splits off and creates World 3 Series B. Now we have 3A and 3B, but 3B is shook from whatever outcome created it and has important possibilities in front of it. They choose to go one way, but the other way is strong enough to create Series C. Because a series is from the same world, they are generally quite similar but with key differences. The related worlds may vary more from each other. The important thing is, everything is still connected. The 12 related worlds are all the branches of the same one world, and for the most part, all believe they are the only version of that original one world. Series of a world are all related to their starting world, and are like grandchildren to the first original world. As with the related worlds, a series may not even know of the existence of other series/worlds and have no reason to believe they are not the only world.  

Got it? Great!

So I read Charmed Life a tale of orphaned Eric "Cat" Chant (of 12A), who with his sister Gwendolyn, moves into Chrestomanci Castle. Gwendolyn has a gift for magic, Cat does not. She is thrilled to be fostered by Chrestomanci, because Chrestomanci is the title of the strongest magic user in ALL of the worlds. They are a nine-lifed enchanter/ess who are given the government job/title of Chrestomanci to police magic in the related worlds and prevent it's misuse and abuse. They are chosen because of their nine-lives. This means that all the versions of this individual that should have existed across their series, for whatever reason did not. So they got all the lives and magic and talent that would have been spread across, making them very powerful. I don't want to spoil Charmed Life so I won't say too much, except the first book introduces the concept and the main Chrestomanci throughout the series: Christopher Chant. The books themselves have different protagonists and take place in different worlds or series, but the link is always Christopher in his role as Chrestomanci gets summoned at one point and helps sort out the magical mess. Interestingly enough, not every series of a world has magic, but Chrestomanci still will (born with it).

That's essentially the back story needed to understand Conrad's Fate: Multiple worlds, some with magic, One enchanter/ess to govern them all, main one throughout series is Christopher Chant.

Now that that's covered, I'm going to go back to the nostalgia factor. I devoured these books, after reading and loving Charmed Life. It didn't hurt that I was born after the last one was published, so could burn through them. I remember finding the series in a smaller Indigo Books and my older cousin who was with me, bought me the next book. It was a gift and I felt special. This book series remind me of that moment, as well as the excitement of being a kid discovering a new book series. Discovering a new series is always a rush for me. It's like finding the key to a secret room, but no one else has it. I can decide to lend deserving people that key, or I can not. It's mine. 
Reading Conrad's Fate brought back all that excitement from when I was 13, as I revisited the Worlds of Chrestomanci, that I had fell in love with. There we have it, now nowhere left to go but onto the book so...onto the book.

Conrad's Fate by Diana Wynne Jones

What to say about this book? You all know it was read through a nostalgic lens, so there is going to be some positive bias for sure. Overall, I really enjoyed it! I read it in a single day, as it is a quick, easy read. This is true of all the books in the series, and I don't think I took more than a day or two to read any of them.  What struck me right away about this book was the point of view change. The novels and short stories had been Third-Person narratives, but Conrad's Fate uses First-Person. It is also the only tale that is narrated as a past story, that catches up to the present in the end. It was a nice change, and brought a different intimacy with the protagonist as we are told his thoughts at the time and current opinions of what happened. We are witness to his reflections and how he grew throughout the time period he discusses.

The story takes place at a stately manor, and there is a lot of Upstairs Downstairs or Downton Abbey that comes to mind. Conrad, who has grown up with a "bad fate" is told by his uncle to get a job at Stallery Mansion. His uncle, a magician, has discovered that Conrad's bad fate is due to him not stopping a bad person in a past life. He informs Conrad that he has divined that the person has been reborn, and is at Stallery mansion, and if Conrad finishes the job, his fate will be cleared. Conrad is given some tools to help him and away he goes, making his way to the mansion. He's not particularly impressed because he wants to go away to a magical university, and not murder anyone, but his uncle says his fortune shows he'll die in the year if he doesn't rectify his past life mistake. So what do you do? After passing an interview/examination, he is selected to be an 'improver', or a valet-in-training.
He's not the only one though, selected along with him is an undercover, teenaged Christopher Chant, otherwise known as the future Chrestomanci.

Which leads me to my favourite part of the book: The relationship between these two characters. It was nice to see Christopher as a teenager, but even nicer to see how he quickly bonded with and respected Conrad. Christopher has a quality of not learning names if the person they belong to is not important to him. Conrad is told this quality by Millie, (the reason Christopher is at the mansion is to find her) and realizes Christopher has never forgot his name. There is some nice banter between the two, and Conrad is a likeable character. His descriptions and impressions of Christopher  fill out the other's character very well!

Diana Wynne Jones has two great skills in writing this series (and presumably all her other books and stories): One is writing a series of behind the scenes sub-plots that are hinted at enough to notice them, but not enough to make them distracting or side-tracking. They always come together in a way that wraps up with the main conflict. This book is no exception; there are secret romances, and hidden identities galore.

The second skill is ALL THE TWIST ENDINGS! There is always some stray piece of information that comes out of nowhere at the conclusions, but, when you reflect back...the clues were always sort of there. There are some twists I see coming, but there are others I'm left shocked at. This is very hard to do to me. If you were to ask my sister, there is no twist ending I haven't predicted half-way through the book. Sometimes before that! As was the case with Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. She read it before me, and told me I wouldn't like it. My response, hmm...(16 years ago spoiler alert) Sirius dies eh? "How did you guess that?" "It's the only thing that makes sense at this point in the tale." While DWJ can be predictable, something does always surprise me to some degree.

What I noticed this time around though, is how badly she writes female characters! There seems to be the same stereotypes she utilizes over again: Beautiful ingenue, Beautiful harpy,  Fat, plain, kindly woman, Fat, plain, horrible woman.  She then adds a quirk or extra element to one of those cookie cutters, and voila! A female character is created! That being said, Mille is absolutely interesting in every book she appears in, and this one is no exception. It's like all the dimension she could write in a secondary protagonist/side character who is female, was put into Millie. Although to be fair, Witch Week she builds some developed girls, but one is also the co-protagonist. She should be interesting!

Another key theme that seems to wind through the series, is how adults can let you down, particularly your own family. Conrad has a neglectful mom, and doesn't realize it until the end. Cat Chant was manipulated and used by his sister (Charmed Life). Christopher Chant was manipulated and used by his uncle (The Lives of Christopher Chant). She writes  those careless micro-aggressions parents might inflict on their children without realizing it, very well. It's a good reminder that everything we do is being noticed and picked up. That what we think are throwaway comments or minor criticism can be internalized and build into something more. As a teacher this is something I'm always thinking about and I try to be as specific and intentional with my words as possible.


All in all, it was a fun book and a great trip down nostalgia lane. I do recommend this series to anyone who wants to go on a fun, magical journey. If you've, dear reader, read a nostalgic book please tell me about it in the comments, or tell me what book you think would make you nostalgic to read now and why! I'd love to hear your thoughts and add some new books to the list!

Until next time, when I'll be reading a book with a two-word title!

Jass

PS. One last shout out to S. Boden: I think those wee ladies of yours would enjoy this series! And thanks for being a fellow book lover!



Sunday, January 6, 2019

2019: Otherwise known as 'Here We Go Again!"

Hello friends,

It's me again.

Trying once more to complete the Popsugar Reading Challenge and document my journey.
Why am I doing this? This all started in 2016, when I first attempted the challenge, and made some progress, but did not finish. Not one to let failure get in my way, I decided to try again in 2017 where I'm happy to report I made an astonishing 0% of progress. So completely one to let failure get me down, I didn't bother attempting in 2018, and dare I say did a very successful job of not doing the challenge! Hashtag winning y'all!

But,
This year is different. This year, I feel as if I can really do this thing. I have a giant list of books I already want to read through, and many could fit into the challenge criteria. I was also encouraged by a friend to update this blog, and what can I say? I'm a sucker for an entertained audience. I also want to read more books than I did last year, and I want to encourage my friends to do the same. Please, follow along with me. I am starting the challenge with "A book that makes you nostalgic" Find your own book that makes you nostalgic and share it with me in the comments! I'll be posting my thoughts some time next week!

So here we go again! Hopefully you'll like to join me on this journey, and more hopefully you'll be entertained along the way!

Happy 2019!

Jass

Monday, January 2, 2017

New Year, New Reading Challenge!

Hello Readers!

I hope you all had a wonderful holiday season, and are happily coming out of your zombie states from various levels of seasonal partying. I, myself, still feel dazed and confused and not fully ready to go back to my day job of educating teenagers. I felt that gasp of sympathy readers, and I thank you. If you are saying to yourself, 'I didn't gasp with sympathy!'...I reply only with- You read the part where I admit I spend most of my time with teenagers right? Right?! Naw, just kidding. They're adorable (usually) and not scary at all (mostly).

I'm also not ready to give up this life of food and leisure I've been enjoying the last couple of weeks. So many parties, so many dinners, and so many wonderful friends and family. I feel especially glad to have been able to meet up with people I haven't seen in awhile. Here's my advice to anyone who cares to listen/take it: If you find yourself thinking of someone you haven't seen in some time, and you are wondering what they are up to/ how they are doing? Reach out to them! Seriously, get in touch!

But enough blathering on about holidays and meetings- Once upon a time, this blog's purpose was to document my goal to complete PopSugar's 2016 Reading Challenge. If you've been following this blog, you might have noticed that it stopped somewhere before the middle of the year... Yeah, I didn't do so well. I sadly, didn't complete it; not even enough to cheat and pretend I did.

How do I rectify this? Simple! I try again! If at first you don't succeed, try, try and try again!
So this New Year...I bring you the New Reading Challenge:

This time I aim to actually complete this bad boy/girl/they (for the gender neutral)
At the very least, I'd like to do better than before. So, please join me once again, as I attempt the challenge and document my experience with the books I encounter!

Happy New Year!

Tuesday, April 12, 2016

Internet Chats

It's another round of Jass. Reads. Books.
I'm your host: Jass. Not the same one who reads books, but the other one who wastes time on the internet. A sentence written solely to transition into this post's book-
Book #8: A Dystopian Novel: Notes from the Internet Apocalypse by Wayne Gladstone. 

Actually, I'm going to back track a little before I dive into this novel. It's been a while since we've all sat around our desk/laptops and just chatted. How have you been? What's going on? The kids look taller.  
There, isn't that nice? I feel like we've really bonded just now, and I want you all to know that...my dog once farted in my ear.

And...we're back to the book! So I'm kind of cheating a little bit with the category I've placed this book into. It's not really a typical dystopian world that one thinks of when reading the genre. There's no Katniss playing a game of Hungry, Hungry, Hippos, or 1984 being a boring season of the hit show Big Brother. No, this is a book about the internet disappearing. So it's a million times worse than anything that could possibly happen. Imagine living in the now, without the net? Seems like no big deal right? Except...if you didn't have the internet, you couldn't be reading this blog! THE HORROR! OH, THE HORROR!

Notes from the Internet Apocalypse takes place in our present, or technically a few years ago, and as mentioned the internet has just disappeared. Like vanished without a trace, and no one knows why or how. We're introduced to our protagonist Gladstone (Yes, the author named his character after himself--egotistical twat! Also follow him on twitter, he's pretty funny! He wrote for Cracked, which is basically the only reason I ever heard of this book!) and his recount of what happened. The novel is written as a journal (hence the "notes" part of the title) which is not usually a style I enjoy. My thought is always, if it's a journal, it's the past. If it's the past, I don't see why I need to care because a) everything worked out, or b) the writer is dead. There's nothing I can do at this point. However, I did enjoy it in this book. It worked really well for the journey Gladstone goes on. You see, he and his friend Tobey, decide they should go on a quest to find the internet and bring it back. Along the way they meet a bunch of characters: Oz, a young Australian woman, Jeeves, a psychic/living wikipedia, a special NET Recovery agent (newly created in the dire times of no net), and more.

 
I love this cover
 This is really where Gladstone's work shines: In his descriptions of people and moments. He has some fantastically hilarious lines and I found myself laughing out loud in surprised bursts. The quest is quite funny and the pace of the novel really helps it. He also utilizes a lot of comedy tools like repetition, witty banter, etc. (the etc. is there to hide I don't know what else a comedian needs...jokes? I don't know? Ask that guy on Seinfeld, whatever his name is.) There is an earnestness in the book, that makes the main character likeable. Not super likeable, but enough that you're like- guy, you're okay!

Jeeves (my favourite character) dubs Gladstone the "Internet Messiah" after a premonition. Remember, he's psychic. This sets a slew of people after Gladstone, but luckily for him-they don't know what he looks like. A cult forms around Jeeves to find him, and a radical Christian sect goes on a witch hunt. Additionally the government is looking for him. The interesting thing about this book is that despite being so absurd, it's kind of believable. I mean, not really...but I never really questioned the premise or the plot. That's pretty rare for me. I think part of it is how well it suits a journal style narration, but it's also that Gladstone (Character) recognizes how absurd the world has become. He's just trying to live in it. Which is pretty true to real life.

If you can't tell, I really liked this book. It's particularly funny if you know the internet. You see, because the internet has disappeared-there are people who can't handle it and have become zombies. Not literal zombies, but aimless people who are looking for like minded people to recreate their part of the internet. They hang out in groups based around which area of the web they frequented: YouTube, Reddit, etc. They are frightening in their political message(implied) and hilarious in their descriptions (opposite of implied). Gladstone (Author) particularly gives it to the 4Chan squad. The best is the internet concept of Rule 34 (If it exists, or you can think it, there is porn of it on the internet) taken to it's most literal interpretation with a "club" that caters to all needs. Fill out a form, pay a fee, and the club will set it up. It's both bizarre and delightful...especially if you know the internet.

Another thread that runs through this book is the concept of broken connections: Particularly the moments Gladstone flashes back to memories of his dead wife. We get a look into the character's internal life, and it speaks volumes in minimal scenes. It's probably what keeps this book grounded.

One of the things I disliked is the frequent use of the word "retarded". It wasn't really used in a derogatory sense, but it's still not cool. 

Would I recommend you read this book? I would. It takes an interesting turn in the end and sets up the next book. There's a lot of good social commentary in what is a fairly "out there" premise. Gladstone's a good writer and can keep your attention and the flow of the story going.
Check it out!

 

Tuesday, March 22, 2016

Exclusive Interview with Jessica Jarman, and Bronwyn Green!


Hello everyone! Welcome to a special edition of this blog: Today we have authors/editors Bronwyn Green and Jessica Jarman joining us! I got the pleasure to interview them both a little about their writing practices, useful criticism, and of course books you should read! They did a fantastic and professional job of answering my amateurish questions, and random tangents! Lets dive in shall we?

Lets hear a little about Bron-

Bronwyn Green (BG): I write young adult fiction under Christine Allen-Riley and erotic romance under Bronwyn Green. I’m also a mom, a wife, a blogger, a compulsive crafter (mostly knitting & sewing and also pottery and cross stitching when I have time) and I’m also a binge watcher of Netflix.

And you Jess?

Jessica Jarman (JJ): I write erotic romance. I’m also a wife, mom, and super obnoxious fangirl of many things. (Shocker, I know) When I’m not writing, I’m spending time with family and friends, attempting to be crafty and often failing, and marathoning, and squeeing uncontrollably, over my fave shows.

Jass: Great introductions ladies! And I love YA and Children's Literature, Bron. It's my super guilty, but deliciously enjoyable pleasure! I’ll definitely have to pick up a copy of your books!

BG: I love YA and Children’s Lit, too! I have a pretty large collection of children’s books. But The Paper Bag Princess will forever be my fave. :D But there are so many absolutely amazing books out there. Noble Hearted Kate is another favorite. Oh, and Drac and the Gremlin. One of the coolest books on pretend play that I’ve ever seen. Sadly, I think these both might be out of print, now. Have you read The Scorpio Races or The Raven Boys/Raven Cycle? Ah-MAZ-ing!!! I’m anxiously awaiting the last book in the series. Oh, my YA is called Iron Falls: Eventide. (homicidal soul-sucking faeries) :)

Jass: I actually did start the Raven Boys; borrowed the first book from the library but for reasons I can't remember, never finished it. I should check it out again. I'll definitely keep my eye out for your book: Homicidal Faeries are my favourite kind! Muhwahahahha!
So lets get started with the difficult questions shall we? And by that I mean, lets see if I can formulate something articulate to ask you, without sounding like a total dafty!

What are you currently working on?

BG: I’m currently working on two books - the second book in my paranormal YA series, Iron Falls, under my real name, and my next contribution to my and Jess’ BOUND series—it’s called In Bounds.

JJ: I’m [also] currently working on the next book in Bron and my BOUND series—Safeword Protected—and the next ALBION book, Into the Deep.

Jass: Safeword Protected, what a title!  Sounds super intriguing-what's being protected? Why is it so important...Why have I not read this already? Don't talk to me, go finish this book...while I catch up! As usual, excitement carried me away to semi-lunacy. I'm back on track now, so lets go into process then-

How do you form the story? How do you start and what are the elements you feel need to be there to be a solid start (if not complete book) ?

BG: First off, you should know that I’m the pantsiest pantser that ever pantsed. [Pantser refers to writers who "fly by the seat of their pants", or just kind of sit down and write, and see where it takes them, instead of plotting everything down before starting.] Myusual M.O. goes a lot like 1.) Get a snippet of dialogue stuck in my head. 2.) Figure out who’s saying what to who and why. 3.) Imagine the rest of the scene and write it down. 4.) Think about the characters in the scene and who else is part of their lives. 5.) Figure out what the main characters’ problem/issue/need/want/childhood trauma is. 6.) Get some more sort of vague, story-shaped ideas that might be incorporated at some point. 7.) Think about what needed to happen prior to that first bit of dialogue that first popped into my head in order for that dialogue to occur in the first place. 8.) From there, come up with a reasonable starting place for the story and begin. 9.) Write until I reach the spots I have notes for. 10.) Cry and wish that I were an actual plotter instead of a pantser, and call Jess for therapy and brainstorming. 
 
[Jass: Look at how adorable these two are! Friends, collaborators, sounding walls! I love it-brings tears to my cynical little heart!]

I know some people who meticulously plot the book from beginning to end before they write a single word of the story. But as much as I often wish that was a skill that was in my wheelhouse, it just isn’t. So, I guess the short answer (too late) to this question is I need to “hear" one or more of the main characters in my head, know at least a little about who they are as people, have a general idea about their goals and conflicts, and have at least one future plot point that I’m writing toward.

JJ: I’ve always been a pantser—I don’t need a whole lot to start a story, to be honest. Sometimes, it’s just a snippet of conversation in my head, or it’s a secondary character that intrigued me in another book, an idea that comes to me… And I just go with it. I’ve probably plotted more in the last couple years than I have in my entire career, and that’s mostly with the Albion’s Circle series—because there is an overriding plot arc through the whole series. It’s not working on just one book, one story. I have to keep track and plan so that each book has some satisfying resolution but still leads into the the next book and continuation of the overall conflict/plot of the series.

Jass: That's amazing how little you both go off of! I know from my experience writing prose, I find it very difficult to get started.  And I feel you both about being a total  pantser-like must attract like-but that’s totally me with my playwriting. I seem to have a similar M.O. actually. I hear/see a scene first and then write. So it’s interesting that when writing a play all I need is a snippet, like yourselves, but prose I find far more challenging. I love what you said about looking for characters needs/wants. It's a great place to understand the conflict then. In theatre we talk about it in terms of objectives: what's the goal? With the conflict becoming what gets in the way of achieving that goal. So while on this track,

What would you say makes a strong conflict?

JJ: Oh boy, I don’t have an easy answer for this one. I think anything could potentially be a strong conflict if written well. If the conflict is written is a way that is believable and relatable then it works. I tend to identify with, and write more, internal conflict. Give me the angsty feels, and I’m a fan for life. I eat it up with a spoon. Don’t get me wrong, external conflict is always a good thing, but I really love the emotional side of what pushes a character to do what he/she does. What gets in the way of their happiness, what is holding them back. A book (or more) that excels in having strong relatable internal or external conflict: I think Bron’s Out of Sync nails internal conflict. It’s brilliantly done, and it is a book I go back to again and again for that reason. For external conflict? I love Kris Norris’ books for that. I’m actually envious of her writing in that regard because I feel external conflict is something I’m not very strong with, to be honest. But it’s something I keep working on.

BG: I think we first have to look at what kinds of conflict we’re talking about. I’m of the opinion that stories need both internal and external conflicts, and ideally, they should feed off each other. Internal/personal/emotional conflict is all about what the characters bring to the story. Their baggage, if you will. This kind of conflict arises from the insecurities, emotional scars, and past trauma that everyone has experienced at some level. For example, a fear of abandonment, unworthiness, guilt, etc. The conflict arises when the main characters’ wants and needs clash. This is the sort of conflict that can’t be solved with a simple conversation. It requires personal growth—usually on the parts of both characters. External or situational conflict arises from the plot. It can be anything from a hostile business takeover to a scientific breakthrough to an archaeological dig to video game development to opening a specialty cupcake store (are those still a thing?) to killing vampires to saving the world. In a romance, the internal/emotional/personal conflict is usually the stronger of the two—unless you’re writing romantic suspense, and then it’s pretty much even. In other genres, I think it’s a fairly even division, unless we’re talking young adult and literary fiction, those also tend more toward personal or emotional conflict. All that said, I think almost anything can make a strong conflict - particularly a strong emotional conflict - as long it's believable and relatable and as long as the reader both sees and feels the impact on the characters.

Jass: That's a great way to break conflict up and I couldn't agree more. I've found a lot of times I had trouble getting through a book, it was because the characters internal life was lacking and the stakes weren't high enough to invest in them.

Is there a book (or more) in particular you find excels at having a strong, relatable, internal and external conflict?

BG: Please believe me when I tell you that I don’t say this lightly, or because she’s my BFF, but Jarman’s Albion’s Circle series EXCELS at internal and external conflict. The stakes are incredibly high, and get higher with each book in the series. And with what’s coming, I’m kind of wanting to huddle in the corner. Oh, and Nothing Serious, one of her BOUND books has some of my very favorite conflict ever. That book gave me all the feels. And obviously, Jenny Trout’s Boss series is teeming with well-drawn conflict - internal and external. We won’t even talk about The Baby... The internal conflict in Charlotte Stein’s Intrusion is a beautiful, beautiful thing. As much as I love that book, I don’t think the external conflict got as much of the attention as perhaps it should have. But that book is a re-reader for me because of the internal conflict. Both characters’ issues are apparent, even though it’s told in first person, single narrator. It’s one of my very favorites in the history of ever.

Jass: Great books list... I obvs agree with Albion circle as I devoured three books in three days. SERIOUSLY, THREE DAYS-THREE BOOKS!…And still sniffle over the third! Ms. Jarman! (Also, side note, Jessica watched Bronwyn read the third and cry on her couch! That sick puppy! :P)

JJ: MWAH! *blush* you guys…I’m just happy you like Albion. I love it so much. So much I want to cry sometimes. And am DYING to finish the next one. *ahem* May be a bit dramatic today, just saying. :)

Jass: Jessica deserves to get as dramatic as she wants—it’s a very good series! I don’t read romance much/at all, but there’s more than enough action to satisfy me. It's also done in multiple POV, so you get the emotional lives, and internal conflict of many characters. This is very hard to do, and particularly difficult to do well...Jess does it well. But building on this issue of conflict…

How do you know when you've written a solid conflict for your characters? How often do you go back and revise it?

JJ: I’ll be honest. I don’t think my conflict game is as strong as it should be. It’s something that I struggle with daily. Usually, what happens as I’m pantsing my way through the story is that I’ll get to a 1/3 or 1/2 way finished, and I squint at it from multiple angles and decide that I need to make things shittier for my characters, and after I figure out exactly how to do that, I go back and layer more stuff into the section I’ve already written. Not terribly scientific, I know. :/

BG: Sometimes, the conflict ups itself naturally from groundwork I laid without even realizing it. That happened in Finding You and in Eventide. Suddenly, there were these surprise jolts that cranked things way up for the protagonists, and all I could do was sit there and think… "thanks for looking out for me, brain.”

JJ: [In terms of revising] I fall back on “Trust your story; trust your characters”. I repeat that to myself so many times while writing, it’s a constant loop in my head. I really let the characters lead the story. And I have great beta readers I trust, who will be honest with me. Brutally so, if needed. As for how often I’ll revise? However many times it takes.

BG: I try to listen to the story, but often, I still don’t feel like I’m nailing the conflict like I want to. But that’s one of the things I’m actively working on. :)

Jass: It sounds like you both have a great, organic way of coming up with conflict! It seems like you pay attention to the worlds you are creating, which is awesome because one of my reader peeves is forced drama. Particularly the dreaded girlfriend in a refrigerator trope. If you can’t find a way to create drama without a woman being used as a prop…then I’m sorry but IMO you’re a crappy writer: Whether that’s novels, television, comics, or movies. The migraines I get from my exaggerated eye-rolling-I tell you what! Jenny Trout's [another writer and friend of Bron’s and Jess’] been reviewing Appolonia...and the forced and shallow "conflict" kills me. I was surprised to learn the book wasn't over at the latest recap because it feels so long. I honestly don’t know how she inflicts such pain on herself by not only continuing to read the thing, but trying to analyze it as well. How do you breakdown nothing?!

But that’s a great point you raise Bronwyn about not always feeling like you’ve nailed what you wanted; I feel that way with endings a lot of the time. Like I kind of got what I wanted but not really...which is a nice segue!

What have been your favourite endings? How do you like to wrap up one-shots vs. Books you know you want to make a series?

BG: I also struggle with endings - lol. And I wish I could tell you I loved them all, but I was pretty pleased with the ending of Rising Blood. And I was proud of the big black moment in Drawn That Way, buuuuttttt…that’s not really an ending. OH! Out of Sync. I did like that one quite a bit.

JJ: Endings…endings are tough, yo. LOL I struggle with them, sometimes, but I’ve been happy with the endings of all of my books—even though some of them were difficult to write. Difficult in the sense of coming up with an ending that wraps everything up and is satisfying. I guess if I had to choose a favorite ending…I’d have to say I was very pleased with the ending of London Bound. They made me happy. :) Endings in a series can be tricky. In Albion’s Circle, particularly, because there is so much happening throughout the series that it’s a balancing act—having some things resolved at the end of each book, but the big stuff isn’t…that continues in the next book and beyond. It is honestly one of the hardest things I’ve done as an author, writing a series like this, as opposed to a series of connected books that are essentially one-shots. And that’s where the plotting comes into play. I have an outline for the series. A loose one, but I know all the main events that happen in each book, what does get resolved in each, etc. The pantser in me rebelled but it really needed to be done that way.

BG: Most of my series don’t feature the same protagonist in each book. Typically, subsequent books are about secondary characters from previous books, so they’re *almost” written like one shots. In those stories, nearly everything about the main characters are wrapped up, but there might be some open story threads that tie into next book in the series, or, in the case of the Witch Way series, the first book’s threads tied more directly to the third. Thus far, only my YA features the same protagonist all the way through. And that’s definitely a tricker wrap-up. You have to have enough resolution to satisfy the reader, but leave enough unanswered questions to make them want to read the next book. Since I’m not a plotter, I’m pretty much deciding what to wrap up and what to leave hanging entirely by feel as I’m getting closer to the end.

Jass: That makes sense. I wrote my first novella for nanowrimo last November. Nothing to write home about, but I struggled with how to end it because I can see it continuing. I didn't know how final it should be. If I wasn't working against the clock, I'd probably have driven myself insane trying to make it just right. Luckily I was just focused on finishing to over think it.

BG: You were doing NANO?

Jass: I did do it-first time, total pantser, 4 days late. And that right there says nearly everything about me!

BG: I saw a meme that said something like, “I’ve run out of excuses. I’m late because of who I am as a person.” That pretty much sums up my life. So, I feel you. But hey - you finished!

Jass: LOL! I’m right with you; and yes, I did finish. Kind of. Still working on an ending—to come full circle! But I actually want to go back a little to Jess’ comments about having good beta readers. I think this is  a really important part of the creative process. For those that don’t know; beta readers are kind of like editors in the sense they read your work for you and offer feedback about the story and how they interpret it, feel about it, what’s interesting, what drags, etc. So that brings me to my next question-

What do you consider effective or useful criticism/suggestions when writing a book?

I know for myself, not being precious about my work is always a tough thing to do. We have a theatre mantra: hold on tightly, let go lightly. Which basically translates into create and nurture your work, protect it...but then let it go. Make it a gift and share it.

JJ: Effective and useful criticism? I’m incredibly lucky in the beta readers I have. I know they have my best interests at heart, and I trust them wholeheartedly. They are always specific in their criticism—pointing out exactly what isn’t working and why they think that is, and they are always willing to brainstorm with me and help me fix it. And that is invaluable. It's hard to hear something isn’t working in a book, or something is missing. And, to be honest, no matter who it comes from, there’s always the knee-jerk reaction of “What? No way, how DARE YOU?” LOL But it doesn’t last long because of all the things I mentioned before—the trust and knowing what’s behind the criticism.

BG: Hmmmm…effective and useful criticism, huh? I’ll admit, criticism used to make me wilt and feel like I totally sucked at everything. But I have a somewhat healthier outlook, now. And a slightly thicker skin. :) First and foremost, I love my beta readers because they’re not only honest in what’s working for them and what isn’t, they’re also incredibly specifc. Specifics can make all the difference during the editing process. It’s one thing to hear that the pacing is slow in parts - and it’s another for them to point at exactly where it’s slow. It makes fixing it easier. My CPs are committed to helping me tell the best stories possible. I think the most important kind of criticism is honest - even if it sucks to hear. Yep - honesty is literally the most important and effective thing when critiquing. Unfortunately, I think a lot of time, people tell authors what they think the authors want to hear as opposed to how they might actually be feel about a book for fear of hurting the authors' feelings. Jess and I are both editors for our company, Round Table Author Services. I think we’ve both had experiences with clients whose beta readers have "loved everything" about their novels, and when they received edits from us, they’re blindsided by the disparity between our responses vs. their beta readers’ responses. This isn’t to say that Jess and I are going on a great big hate-fest every time we edit a book. Our edits are kind, but firm, and in addition to being thorough, we pride ourselves on being honest with our clients. Avoiding the truth, whether you’re doing a favor for a friend or a favorite author or you’re an industry professional, doesn’t help the author put their best work forward.

Jass: I don’t want to sound biased, because I obviously consider the two of you as friends, but I think that’s really what separates good writers, from great writers-That ability to take constructive feedback and criticism well. If you’re serious about your craft (whatever it is), then, even while it hurts, you should be open to areas of improvement. I’m not surprised that both of you respond well to honest critique, and that you both give it as well. I think it says a lot about your professionalism. Well before I spend too much of your time, and since this is a blog about books… I guess I'll just end with:

What is one book everyone should read, and why? Feel free to choose titles you've already said and elaborate! :)

BG: One of our books or one of someone else’s?

Jass: Whichever you prefer. Either!Or! Both! :)

BG: Okay, so for books everyone should read… (Heads up, I’m about to be a big cheaterpants.) For children’s fiction, I’m going to say The Paper Bag Princess by Robert Munsch. TPBP is brilliant story on so many levels. It shows the importance of peaceful and clever actions as opposed to violence, substance and character over superficiality, and I think, most important of all, the necessity of loving yourself enough not to settle for someone who wants you to change to meet their expectations of who you should be - even if that means walking away from that person.

The second book I’m going to toss out is The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood. I’ve loved this book for the last 20-some years - hated the movie, though. However, the story that once made me even more aware of the daily micro-aggressions against women now utterly terrifies me, because apparently Atwood is some kind of prophet since western civilization - the U.S. in particular - is sitting far closer to becoming The Republic of Gilead than I ever would have imagined possible. I think it’s an important read because as society works to chip away at women and other minorities' basic rights, many people tend to become emotionally exhausted and overwhelmed and turn away from the situation and just assume it’ll all turn out okay without us needing to say or do anything about it. And instead, we already find ourselves living in a world where white people kill people of color with next to no consequences, where a woman’s ability to govern her own body is not a forgone conclusion, where LGBTQA people are persecuted on a daily basis. Is reading THMT going to fix that? No. But, I feel like it might help open people’s eyes to the sort of nightmare we’re heading for if things continue the way they have been.

I would be remiss if I didn’t suggest one of my girl, Jarman’s books. She’s truly one of the most talented writers I know of and happily have the privilege of being friends with. Disclaimer: even if we weren’t friends, I’d still love her work. Jess’ books have a depth of emotion and angst that I adore. They’re beautifully written, and her characters are so real. I know you’ve read the first three Albion books, so the book I’m recommending is another of my all-time faves of hers: Nothing Serious. At the heart of this love story that’s funny, scorchingly hot, and heartbreaking are two guys who are denying some of the most important parts of themselves and their lives for others. I think a lot of us do that - put our own needs last often at the detriment of our happiness. Which isn’t to say that I think everyone should run about being selfish jerks - just that consistently putting ourselves last is not only bad for us, it’s bad for the people we love since they’re not getting the best version of us, either. And this story illustrates that perfectly.

I’ll admit, it’s a lot easier to evangelize about other people’s books than try to say something positive about mine without feeling like a braggy jerk. But that’s one of those bullshit socialization things, isn’t it? Oft times, we see men who speak positively about their work as confident and women who do the same as braggarts, and so we typically tend to not say anything. GAH. I’m having angst. But in an attempt to be confident, I’m going to add Drawn That Way to the list. It was recently mentioned on a book blog as being a feminist romance, which, as you can imagine from my earlier book recs, thrilled me to no end. DTW is a geeky romance set in video game design company. I’d be lying if I said that Rory, the hero, who’s a bit socially awkward, and Tristan, the heroine, who’s maybe a little impulsive, weren’t special to me. I love their humor, their passion and even their flaws. I enjoyed delving into the sexism rampant in video game culture, consent and sexual harassment in the workplace. I also love strong women who aren’t in competition with other women. Writing this book was really important to me for a variety of reasons, but one of the most important is that someone I once knew said I’d be terrible at writing books in this subgenre. But I think it turned out quite well. And what started out as being something to “prove” turned into a story I really love. [Jass: Yeah Girl!]

Damn, that was a long answer. Sorry about that!

Jass: No apologies needed! That was a fantastic answer, on a super hard question! I know, it’s not really fair to ask about a few favourites-it’s a near impossible task! Also I recently read The Handmaid's Tale, and I agree 100% with everything you said! It blew me away; and the writing is so vivid and filled with tension and oppression and hope. Just so beautiful and jarring.

BG: That book is just so amazing. I’m so glad you loved it, too! My son, Corwin, just read it - he had to choose a “college-level” book for English class. He liked it, but it depressed the hell out of him. I keep thinking about re-reading it, but I’m not sure that emotionally I’m up for it at the moment.
We were at my mom’s, and I was trying to work her stove and all it has are numbers and pictographs, and I couldn’t figure out what anything did, and yelled, “What kind of Handmaid’s Tale level of bullshit is this?” Corwin died laughing and had to explain it to everyone else.

Jass: LMAO! Wow, what a smarty! It’s not an easy book either, it's fairly dense with subtext and subtle hints at social problems! I'm calling it-You are raising Corwin right! What about you Jarman? Hit me with your best shot!

JJ: I can’t just say one book! That’s…that’s…impossible! So I’m going to recommend more than one, because I can. Jane’s Austen’s Pride and Prejudice. OMG I can’t tell you how much I adore this book. I’ve read it so many times over the years and still read it at least once a year now. And what it comes down to, I think? While there is plenty of external conflict—most of it stemming from the society and culture in which it’s set—internal conflict galore. Elizabeth Bennet and Mr. Darcy? Please, behold the King and Queen of Internal Conflict, my friends. Where is my spoon, because I’m ready to eat it up?! 

I’m going to recommend one of Bron’s, of course. I’m super lucky to be friends with her and working on the Bound series with her, but I read her stuff before we became friends and loved it. She has a way of crafting a story that just pulls you in immediately, and you find yourself relating to and loving her characters in a very real way. Specifically? As I mentioned, Out of Sync is one I go back to again and again. The internal conflict….oh my, it just ticks all my boxes, no matter how many times I read it. I adore James and Morgan to no end. 

And I will go against everything ingrained in me and recommend one of my own. My friends (including Bron) and I have talked a lot about this—how it’s so hard to talk positively and recommend our own work. As if, by doing so, we are bragging or thinking too highly of ourselves. Well, I’m going to shake off that BS, here it goes… If I had to say read anything of mine—it would either the Bound books, which I’m incredibly proud of, or the Albion Circle series. Albion’s Circle means so much to me—the story, the characters made me fall in love with writing again. I laugh and cry while I’m writing these books, and they are truly something special to me.

Jass: Your best shot is very strong indeed! I felt it! Pride and Prejudice is definitely a classic, although I have to admit I haven't actually read the book; I've only watched the BBC version with Jennifer Ehle and Colin Firth (a few hundred times). I'm terrible, I know. Well, I think that’s all the time we have for! I absolutely loved talking to you gals about writing, and books. You’re both fabulous- THANK YOU SO MUCH!

So that’s it fine readers! Thanks for following along! Please check out Bronwyn and Jessica’s books: They are fantastic writers, and lovely people. You can catch them at:

Brownyn Green: Blog|Twitter| Books
Jessica Jarman:  Blog | Twitter| Books

I would definitely suggest following them on twitter, especially if you enjoy witty comments on popular culture and television!

Until next time my loves!